Cooperativismo y Desarrollo, May-August 2024; 12(2), e722
Translated from the original in Spanish
Experience of good practices
Cooperative network of community tourism. Development alternative in the Sierra Gorda Biosphere Reserve
Red cooperativa de turismo comunitario. Alternativa de desarrollo en la Reserva de la Biosfera Sierra Gorda
Rede de cooperativas de turismo de base comunitária. Alternativa de desenvolvimento na Reserva da Biosfera de Sierra Gorda
Eduardo Mata Arratia1 0000-0002-3472-116X
lalomata1995@gmail.com
Yanelli Daniela Palmas Castrejón1 0000-0002-7158-0212
hashir04@hotmail.com
Rocío del Carmen Serrano Barquín1 0000-0002-5695-751X
rocioserba@yahoo.com.mx
Andrea Edurne Jiménez Ruíz1 0000-0002-6928-6567
andreaedurnejr@gmail.com
1 Autonomous University of the State of Mexico. México.
Received: 26/02/2024
Accepted: 27/06/2024
ABSTRACT
In the face of profound changes and needs in rural environments, tourism represents a holistic development alternative for the use of resources and social cohesion that generates benefits. In the Sierra Gorda Biosphere Reserve in Querétaro, Mexico, several community-based tourism ventures have recently been integrated but work in a disjointed manner, limiting their strengthening and consolidation. The objective of the present study was to analyze whether the integration of a network can be a tool for local development in the region. Through participatory action research with a constructivist approach and techniques such as semi-structured interviews, community workshops and participatory observation, the visionary perspective of the communities, entrepreneurs, and the main public, private and governmental institutional actors at the local level was rescued. The results highlight cooperativism, from a theoretical perspective, as a cornerstone of community tourism, where social cohesion generates better results. On the other hand, from practice, the Network was formed with self-management and protagonism of the community, in a solidary, viable and environmentally responsible tourism activity. It is concluded by visualizing that planning from the cooperation among diverse actors can achieve a development with a sustainable approach.
Keywords: cooperativism; tourism; local development.
RESUMEN
Ante los profundos cambios y necesidades en los entornos rurales, el turismo representa una alternativa de desarrollo holístico para el aprovechamiento de recursos y cohesión social que generen beneficios. En la Reserva de la Biosfera Sierra Gorda en Querétaro, México, recientemente se han integrado diversos emprendimientos turísticos de base comunitaria que trabajan inconexos, limitando su fortalecimiento y consolidación. El objetivo del presente estudio fue analizar si la integración de una red puede ser una herramienta que propicie el desarrollo local en la región. A través de la investigación-acción participativa con enfoque constructivista y técnicas como la entrevista semiestructurada, talleres comunitarios y observación participativa, se rescata la perspectiva visionaria de las comunidades, emprendedores, los principales actores institucionales públicos, privados y de gobierno a nivel local. Los resultados destacan al cooperativismo, desde la perspectiva teórica, como pieza medular del turismo comunitario, donde la cohesión social genera mejores resultados. Por otro lado, desde la práctica se conformó la Red con autogestión y protagonismo de la comunidad, en una actividad turística solidaria, viable y ambientalmente responsable. Se concluye visualizando que la planeación desde la cooperación entre diversos actores puede lograr un desarrollo con enfoque sustentable.
Palabras clave: cooperativismo; turismo; desarrollo local.
RESUMO
Diante das profundas mudanças e necessidades nos ambientes rurais, o turismo representa uma alternativa de desenvolvimento holístico para o uso de recursos e coesão social que gera benefícios. Na Reserva da Biosfera de Sierra Gorda, em Querétaro, México, várias empresas de turismo comunitário foram recentemente integradas, mas funcionam de forma desarticulada, limitando seu fortalecimento e consolidação. O objetivo deste estudo foi analisar se a integração de uma rede pode ser uma ferramenta para o desenvolvimento local na região. Por meio de pesquisa-ação participativa com uma abordagem construtivista e técnicas como entrevistas semiestruturadas, oficinas comunitárias e observação participativa, foi recuperada a perspectiva visionária das comunidades, dos empresários e dos principais atores institucionais públicos, privados e governamentais em nível local. Os resultados destacam o cooperativismo, a partir de uma perspectiva teórica, como a pedra angular do turismo de base comunitária, em que a coesão social gera melhores resultados. Por outro lado, do ponto de vista prático, a Rede foi formada com autogestão e protagonismo da comunidade, em uma atividade turística solidária, viável e ambientalmente responsável. Conclui-se visualizando que o planejamento baseado na cooperação entre diferentes atores pode alcançar o desenvolvimento com uma abordagem sustentável.
Palavras-chave: cooperativismo; turismo; desenvolvimento local.
INTRODUCTION
The rural space as it was known a few decades ago has undergone a process of transformation in the way of life, productive activities and territorial structure; croplands have been replaced by urban areas, focused on the creation of peripheral real estate to satisfy the needs of large cities which, in turn, has meant that some of the areas such as forests or other ecosystems, which by principles and values inherited from the original peoples were conserved or simply marginalized, are now being used for massive agroindustry that has a strong impact on the customs and ways of life of the communities (ECLAC et al., 2013; Díaz Sarachaga, 2020).
Given this scenario, tourism has been integrated as a development tool for marginalized rural communities, which make their natural or cultural resources, the little infrastructure they have and the isolated services of the territory available to a certain demanding sector (Montaño Cabezas & Castro Mero, 2022; Vizcarra Bordi et al., 2016). However, the moment comes when they commercialize their customs, traditions and way of life, in order to satisfy the tourist, displacing the community, who suffer from altered staging to make the visitors' experience more meaningful, which is avoided if there is adequate planning (Quiñónez Bedón et al., 2019), such is the case of the Community Based Tourism proposal.
Among other aspects that have allowed the success of community tourism projects are the social capital contained in its members and cooperativism. The Manchester Declaration (Cracogna, 2015) speaks of two groups of cooperative values: I) formed by the values of mutual aid, responsibility, democracy, equality, equity and solidarity and II) includes ethical values that may be present in the activities of non-cooperative organizations such as honesty, transparency, social responsibility and concern for others. The concept of cooperativism goes beyond the organizational figure that is commonly recognized; it has a subjective meaning in relation to the set of networks, norms and trust between diverse social actors that facilitate mutual benefit (González Quiñones et al., 2019; Hidalgo Palma, 2021; Ishihara, 2020) and to the extent of its appropriation as a lifestyle it can have an impact on the development of communities.
Figure 1 shows how community tourism can be a process that, based on cooperativism, can have an impact on local development. Flores Ruiz et al. (2023) define it as the actions undertaken in a concerted manner by the social agents of a given community, in order to increase its development based on the valuation of its human and material resources, in a dialogue with the economic, social and political institutions on which they depend. Vázquez Barquero (1999) defines it as an agent of socio-cultural and environmental transformation and not simply a physical support for economic growth. In this sense, the use of the diverse resources of the territory under a cooperative approach satisfies, on the one hand, the needs of the community and the tourist; on the other hand, it influences the creation of jobs to address poverty, under good practices it affects the care of the environment, it can promote social and gender equity, and even contribute to the empowerment of the local community (Cruz Arce et al., 2020; Huerta Mendoza & Fischer, 2021).
Figure 1. Process of implementation of community tourism as a development alternative
Source: Own elaboration based on Bravo and Zambrano (2018) and Mata Arratia et al. (2021)
In the previous figure, it is also possible to visualize as the basis of this research model the process of community tourism as holistic (a multidisciplinary term that allows relating the whole with each of its parts and vice versa), having cooperativism as a key factor in the social environment, and that this is capable of intervening in the other two environments, the more actors are able to participate, the better indexes will be obtained in the community development of the territories with a tourist vocation, and the more productive chains are integrated from the primary sector to the service sector, improving competitiveness.
With respect to the environment, it is possible to identify governance by community actors over their resources; working together with government institutions or universities can improve their own management of natural resources, as well as design conservation programs or, if necessary, territorial restoration. With cooperativism as a central key, it is possible to obtain an endogenous integrative development that contributes to community wellbeing.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Contextualization of the study area
The Biosphere reserve Sierra Gorda is located in the north of Querétaro State, it covers five municipalities: Jalpan de Serra, Arroyo Seco, Landa de Matamoros, Peñamiller, and Pinal de Amoles, with an approximate area of 383567.44 ha. It was declared on May 19, 1997. Within the region there are five microclimates: xerophytic scrubland, temperate forest, gallery forest, low deciduous forest and cloud forest (Inegi, 2021). For the present study, five ventures in the region were selected as units of analysis (Figure 2); in order to know their location, the services they offer and other general characteristics, table 1 is integrated.
Figure 2. Map showing the location of the ventures and study area
Source: José Alfredo Rosas Heredia based on Inegi (2021)
The ventures analyzed are located in the reserve, which has four microclimates: semi-desert, oak forest, low deciduous forest and cloud forest. Of the five proposed ventures, three share the low deciduous forest ecosystem: Granja "El Higuerón", Cooperativa "El Paraíso" and Restaurante "El Jardín de Barro", while the Management Units have different types of ecosystems: cloud forest in the case of Guayabos and oak forest in the case of Tepame and Jardín.
Table 1. Contextualization of the selected ventures
Name |
Type of organization |
Location |
Description |
"El Higuerón" Farm |
Local private |
"El Lindero", Jalpan de Serra |
Family proposal, of an interactive farm that has the purpose of showing the importance of agricultural and livestock activities, with an academic approach to provide spaces for students who wish to perform their practices. With a sense of leisure/learning for children or families who are interested in the experience of seeing the agri-food process up close. It has six American-style cabins, with materials from the region, promoting eco-technologies. They also offer packages that include lodging plus food or massages. |
Ecotourism Cooperative "El Paraíso". |
Local private |
Ayutla, Arroyo Seco |
Since 2017, it has been a family community level initiative. As of 2019, only two families remain in the project. It aims to be a replicable example in the locality where Paraje "Las Adjuntas" is located, despite its Ejidal figure they have not been able to erect a sustainable and community project. |
El Jardín de Barro" Restaurant |
Local private |
"El Puerto de Ayutla", Arroyo Seco |
This is a different concept from those in the region. It contributes to gastronomic trends such as "Kilometer 0", all inputs are produced by the owners of the establishment or in nearby communities. The restaurant's construction style takes up the principles of sustainability, which also marks a genuine differentiating factor. |
Wildlife Management Unit (UMA in Spanish) "Guayabos". |
Community |
Los Charcos" Community, Jalpan de Serra |
It emerged as an initiative for the conservation of the cloud forest ecosystem, which occupies only a percentage of more than one percent of the national territory according to official figures. A group of approximately fifteen people was formed, who through the National Commission of Natural Protected Areas (CONANP in Spanish), managed three years of funding to acquire monitoring equipment such as camera traps. |
Wildlife Management Unit (UMA) "Tepame y Jardín". |
Community |
Ejido del Jardin, Arroyo Seco |
First UMA in the entire municipality, its objective is to safeguard local biodiversity and generate a development alternative for the community, they chose to design a long-term tourism project, called "Camp Las Camelinas", where in the future they envision five cabins, a Paintball field and some other adaptations. |
Source: Own elaboration based on field work 2020-2021
Methodology
The methodology applied was that of Participatory Action Research (PAR), which is understood as a process whose purpose is to solve problems or pragmatic situations, based on the theoretical-practical relationship of the object of study, despite its proven functionality in various case studies. Figure 3 shows the methodological process, constructivism is proposed as the knowledge builder that will increase the value of the results. This epistemological proposal is opposed to positivism and fractures the antagonism between empirical and realist positions.
Figure 3. Methodological process
Source: Own elaboration based on Espeso Molinero and Pastor Alfonso (2017) and Mata
Arratia et al. (2021)
As shown in the figure above, the methodological process used for this research begins when the researcher is willing to be an active part of the community (IAP), from there he/she will seek the theoretical-conceptual foundation to start towards the diagnosis, where the context of the study area, as well as advantages or areas of opportunity, can be glimpsed. With the analyzed reality, a response will be sought to the theory that can be constructed, confirmed or complemented. The practical proposal that emerges from the previous steps must be agreed upon with the community.
By applying this methodological process in the research, it was possible to divide it into two phases: in the first phase, scientific or rational knowledge was investigated, which allows an analysis of the problems and solutions brought from praxis. For the second phase, based on the field work and together with the actors involved, the vision they have of themselves in the areas of sustainability, the perspective they have on the integration of a cooperative network and the importance that this network can represent in the socioeconomic field for the region were recovered.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Being a holistic and constructivist research, the knowledge contained in the communities, local governments, as well as the theoretical perspective of the researcher before the pragmatic facts were taken into account. The main findings are based on the recognition of tourism activity and its impact on three environments: environmental, economic and sociocultural, key elements in community tourism proposals; therefore, the perspective that entrepreneurs have on these environments was investigated, as shown below, where the meaning, whether conceptual or applied, of the actions they carry out in the tourism field or in their daily work can be appreciated.
Most of the members of the ventures, as well as local authorities in environmental and specialized tourism issues, agree that all tourism activities should be carried out in a holistic manner, taking into account environmental conservation and cultural preservation, as well as community responsibility in the equitable distribution of tourism revenues. Some of the strategies or actions proposed to achieve this integral development are: the organization of tourism activities, the promotion of culture, the use of eco-techniques (infrastructure manufacturing based on 100% natural materials endemic to the region) and the reasonable use of natural resources.
Although the informants have become aware of the importance of the activity and of the advances in the construction of knowledge about tourism by the academic community, sustainability applied to community development is not yet fully seen. For this reason, it is proposed the unification of efforts through cooperativism, a flexible structure, but at the same time solid that allows collective work and results. Based on a community diagnosis and with the understanding that all of them propose different services or products, but that there is a complementary perspective among ventures, several workshops were developed to present the proposal for the integration of a network that allows the achievement of collective objectives, from which the results shown below are derived.
From the results of the field work, the collaboration between academia, the government sector and the ventures, and considering the level of positioning of each venture, the network was formed and registered with the government agencies as "Sierra Tana". Figure 4 shows the different actors involved and the relationships that can emanate from this union. This highlights the perspective of the actors presumably as beneficiaries that cooperativism is a key factor in their ventures, generating cohesion in development.
Figure 4. Community tourism cooperative network in the Sierra Gorda of Querétaro
Source: Own elaboration based on results
The cooperative network is made up of ventures at different levels of consolidation, with Granja "El Higuerón" being the starting point, as it is the most complete in terms of experience and carrying capacity, followed by UMA Tepame y Jardín, UMA Guayabos and Restaurante El Jardín de Barro, ventures that complement each other in terms of tourism and each offer a differentiating experience for tourists. The El Paraíso Ecotourism Cooperative, being the most recent, has areas of opportunity that could be a key detonator if they are taken advantage of. In addition to the above, an analysis of the advantages and disadvantages that can be presented under the cooperative scheme was carried out, based on the awareness workshops and the reception of groups of tourists, as shown in table 2.
Table 2. Advantages and disadvantages of community-based tourism network
Advantages of networking |
Disadvantages of networking |
|
|
Source: Own elaboration based on field work
Participatory action research made it possible to support the communities and their ventures, despite the pandemic. The network was formed in the hope of visualizing its contributions; if the entrepreneurs are strengthened with a collaborative perspective, the communities that show strength in the grouping will be successful (Díaz Sarachaga, 2020). The strengths of working as a group are identified as resilience in critical moments, whether due to internal or external causes that have a negative impact on economic sustainability, which allows confirming that it is possible to get out of the crisis (economic and environmental) faster, through collaborative work.
Authors such as Catalano (2020) and Félix Mendoza and García Reinoso (2020), point out from an economic perspective that tourism gives priority value to numerical indicators such as tourism income, employment generation or participation in local economies, giving less importance to sustainability, as well as to associative value, especially in communities that develop rural tourism products, ignoring the strengths in the supply of services, where biocultural values play a determining role.
On the other hand, there are visions that highlight the organized grouping of communities in tourism, which believe that social cohesion is important, as well as the implementation of cooperative values that strengthen the sociocultural environment (Pacherres Nolivos et al., 2020). In this sense, it is pointed out that cooperativism is a key factor to be able to cohere community projects that intervene in development, where participation, solidarity and integration of people promote the cooperative structure, in addition to being promoters of democracy.
Among the limitations for the development of the research, the COVID-19 pandemic stands out, since the field work began during this; in Querétaro, the entry of outsiders was limited due to health security in the communities, it was necessary to resort to the use of information and communication technologies mainly to be in contact with the representatives of the ventures and for the application of some interviews, later the workshops were carried out personally and it was possible to implement the network.
In conclusion, although there have been several research studies on community tourism and cooperativism, few of them have taken up action research for their analysis, especially to plan in an integrative way, take action and go beyond theoretical proposals or desk work. Undoubtedly, future lines of research open up in which community tourism can be highlighted as a model in which communities seek to take the reins of their tourism planning and development and of the benefits that emanate from it. More than "community-based" tourism, "community-built" tourism should be considered, where actors outside the territory, such as academia, non-governmental organizations, among others, work together to demonstrate the potential of cooperatives as leading companies in the Network or networks proposed by the community to achieve development with a sustainable approach.
REFERENCES
Bravo, O., & Zambrano, P. (2018). Turismo comunitario desde la perspectiva del desarrollo local: Un desafío para la Comuna 23 de Noviembre, Ecuador. Revista ESPACIOS, 39(07). https://www.revistaespacios.com/a18v39n07/18390728.html
Catalano, B. (2020). Turismo, transporte e integración: Un análisis desde la conectividad y las movilidades. Revista Transporte y Territorio, (23), 341-364. https://doi.org/10.34096/rtt.i23.9669
ECLAC, FAO, & IICA. (2013). Perspectivas de la agricultura y del desarrollo rural en las Américas: Una mirada hacia América Latina y el Caribe, 2014. Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura. https://www.cepal.org/es/publicaciones/37136-perspectivas-la-agricultura-desarrollo-rural-americas-mirada-america-latina
Cracogna, D. (2015). La legislación cooperativa latinoamericana en el marco del Plan para una Década Cooperativa de la Alianza Cooperativa Internacional. REVESCO. Revista de Estudios Cooperativos, 117, 12-33. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_REVE.2015.v117.48416
Cruz Arce, S., Delgado Cruz, A., Serrano Barquín, R. del C., & Palmas Castrejón, Y. D. (2020). Cooperativismo y empoderamiento: Historia de vida de la Cooperativa Ecoturística El Paraíso. Estudios del Desarrollo Social: Cuba y América Latina, 8(3), 18-36. https://revistas.uh.cu/revflacso/article/view/5197
Díaz Sarachaga, J. M. (2020). Combining participatory processes and sustainable development goals to revitalize a rural area in Cantabria (Spain). Land, 9(11), 412. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9110412
Espeso Molinero, M. P., & Pastor Alfonso, M. J. (2017). Turismo indígena: Concepto y características de una actividad en auge. En J. Gascón Gutiérrez & C. Milano, El turismo en el mundo rural: ¿ruina o consolidación de las sociedades campesinas e indígenas? (pp. 39-55). Ostelea School of Tourism & Hospitality. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6445826
Félix Mendoza, A. G., & García Reinoso, N. (2020). Estudio de pérdidas y estrategias de reactivación para el sector turístico por crisis sanitaria COVID-19 en el destino Manta (Ecuador). Revista Internacional de Turismo, Empresa y Territorio, 4(1), 79-103. https://doi.org/10.21071/riturem.v4i1.12743
Flores Ruiz, D., Perogil Burgos, J., & Barroso González, M. de la O. (2023). El cooperativismo en la gobernanza del desarrollo territorial. El caso del municipio de Bonares. CIRIEC-España, revista de economía pública, social y cooperativa, (108), 69. https://doi.org/10.7203/CIRIEC-E.108.22793
González Quiñones, Y., Palmas Castrejón, Y. D., Vargas Martínez, E. E., & Serrano Barquín, R. del C. (2019). Una red de cooperación empresarial para el desarrollo local: Corredor turístico "Las Truchas" - Malinalco, México. Estudios y perspectivas en turismo, 28(1), 207-225. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6733404
Hidalgo Palma, K. A. (2021). Una visión crítica del turismo comunitario desde la Ecología Política. Turismo comunitario como alternativa de Desarrollo Sustentable. Caso Comunidad de Yunguilla, Ecuador. El Periplo Sustentable, (40), 26-48. https://doi.org/10.36677/elperiplo.v0i40.12770
Huerta Mendoza, A. K., & Fischer, L. (2021). Sierra Gorda Biosphere Reserve, Querétaro, Mexico: An Example of Sustainable Tourism. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 12(3), 766-774. https://doi.org/10.14505//jemt.12.3(51).15
Inegi. (2021). Información por entidad. Querétaro. Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática. https://cuentame.inegi.org.mx/monografias/informacion/queret/territorio/default.aspx?tema=me&e=22
Ishihara, Y. (2020). Overview of Community-Based Tourism: From History to Evaluation Framework. En The Routledge Handbook of Community Based Tourism Management (pp. 26-38). Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/The-Routledge-Handbook-of-Community-Based-Tourism-Management-Concepts-Issues?Implications/KumarWalia/p/book/9780367622688
Mata Arratia, E., Palmas Castrejón, Y. D., & Serrano Barquín, R. del C. (2021). Turismo comunitario y constructivismo; una propuesta a partir del análisis experiencial en Ayutla, Querétaro. En Paradigmas de Investigación en Ciencias Sociales. ASMIIA.
Montaño Cabezas, J. V., & Castro Mero, J. L. (2022). Análisis crítico de los potenciales turísticos de San Lorenzo de Esmeraldas como elemento de dinamización y sustentabilidad territorial. Polo del Conocimiento, 7(3), 1058-1072. https://polodelconocimiento.com/ojs/index.php/es/article/view/3778
Pacherres Nolivos, S., Vergara Romero, A., & Sorhegui Ortega, R. A. (2020). Responsabilidad social corporativa y el turismo sostenible. Revista científica Ecociencia, 7(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.21855/ecociencia.72.340
Quiñónez Bedón, M. F., Tapia Pazmiño, J. G., & Andrade Naranjo, D. S. (2019). El turismo de aventura: Una estrategia para la nueva ruralidad. Polo del Conocimiento, 4(3), 119-137. https://doi.org/10.23857/pc.v4i3.928
Vázquez Barquero, A. (1999). El desarrollo local: Una estrategia para el nuevo milenio. REVESCO: revista de estudios cooperativos, (68), 15-24. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=1147536
Vizcarra Bordi, I., Thome Ortiz, H., & Jiménez Ruiz, A. E. (2016). Turismo micológico y etnoconocimiento, escenarios de desarrollo local en espacios forestales. En R. Pérez Garcés, E. Espinosa Ayala, & O. E. Terán Varela (Eds.), Seguridad Alimentaria, Actores Territoriales y Desarrollo Edógeno (pp. 107-132). Laberinto Ediciones. http://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/2903300
Conflict of interest
Authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Authors' contribution
All authors contributed to the same extent during the research process, both in structuring the research methodologically and in obtaining the results in the field. A discussion between the theory and the results was carried out among the four authors in order to define the results section.